|
Join Our Newsletter for Promos and Coupons |
| Social Links |
|
|
|
Government & Educational Institutions Click Here for discounts. |
Buying These Products
|
|
|
Note: This testing was done as an internal test to validate our Archival inks.
More data is now available for our Ultra-Tone Black and White
inks.
Many of the ink companies use accelerated test methods to determine the permanence or fade resistance of their inks. These accelerated tests are brutal compared to the RIT type permanence testing with fluorescent light. The objective of the RIT type test is to predict museum life. We are interested in knowing if we have an ink that will resist fading in all kinds of light, including sun light and museum or indoor light, and we need to know right away, not four months later or 50 years later. Light (especially UV), causes the ink/paper system to oxidize. When ink is oxidized it fades. Light and humidity are the two main ingredients that cause inkjet prints to oxidize or fade. Heat, also plays a roll in accelerating the oxidation or fading. So our accelerated test method had to have all three elements to give us confidence that the results we achieve relate to what happens in the real world outside of the laboratory.
The Procedure -
Delta E Data -
Correlation with known inks and papers -
The Somerset Velvet Test - Then the accelerated testing was conducted as described above for four different exposure times of 10 minutes, 20, 30 and 60. Colorimeter readings were taken before and after the testing on each square of color. Actually we took 5 readings per square in different locations and averaged them together to get one reading per square. Then readings for each color (red, green, blue, cyan, magenta, yellow and black) were averaged together to get a single value for the given exposure time. The results are shown in figure 1.
Figure 1 It is quite obvious that the MIS inks did not fade nearly as much as the Epson™ or Lysonic™ inks. The raw data gathered for the graph is shown below. The MIS ink faded 5 times less than the Epson™ ink and 4 times less than the Lysonic™ ink, after 60 minutes of accelerated testing. Figure 2 looks at the same data as a plot of fading vs. exposure time. The results show that the Epson™ ink and the Lysonic™ start to fade quickly, while the MIS inks fade much more evenly as exposure time is increased.
![]() Figure 2 In Figure 3, we isolated the black ink results to get an idea how our quadtone inks will hold up under the accelerated test conditions. It is interesting to note that the Lysonic™ black fades faster that the Epson™ black. Both fade much more than the MIS black. The MIS black stabilizes after about 20 minutes and very little additional fading occurs.
![]() Figure 3 The Lysonic™ yellow is rated by Wilhelm to be superior to the other colors, so we isolated the yellows and show the results in Figure 4. The Lyson and Epson™ yellows do show the best fade resistance of all the colors. However, when a shade of color contains their yellow, the other colors fade away first leaving a yellow cast to what is left. The MIS yellow fades at about the same rate as the rest of the MIS colors and does not produce a yellow cast on the overall image. It is interesting to note that the MIS yellow fades the least, and is still has over 3 times the fade resistance. (Please notice that the vertical scale has changed in Figure 4).
![]() Figure 4
The Delta E Data
|
|
|
The Color Data |
| MIS Fade Test Color Data on Somerset Velvet | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Epson Inks | Lyson Inks | MIS Inks |
Epson™ is a registered trademark of Seiko Epson, Corp
Lysonic™ is a trademark of Lyson Limited





